Friday, August 24, 2012

Travels in looking - thoughts on getting away


Since I'm in the mood I've decided to post some pictures from the end of 2011 through Jan 2012. Admittedly my personal life was going through the car wash so I needed to get out of town and clear my head and sort out what my picture were about. I took a month off and decided to dub my journey as my vision quest. I don't know if it has anything to do with what I was watching at the time or who I was talking to at the time but the images speak for themselves.
Why a quest at all? Because there's always something you're looking for and I was looking for stuff I hadn't seen before. I have to confess, for a long time I didn't believe in traveling. I read enough that I let my mind draw pictures for me. What I didn't realize is that you typically run out of material to fill in the gaps and seeing new things i.e. traveling fuels your mind.
I guess what I'm trying to say is seeing is just as important as imagining. For many of us in the creative industry we're constantly creating for other people. Personally work rarely takes the main stage unless you're lucky enough to have clients who are paying you to make something purely from your perspective. Going off on your own i.e. traveling, walking around, street photography even taking pictures of you pets or kids is purely yours. For this trip, I decided on a road trip around the U.S.
I haven't truly traveled the U.S in this fashion. Hops to Neveda for skiing from California and several trips between Colorado and California. Nothing really descriptive except the road.
Fast forward to the present, early 2012. I got to see a lot of very cool things and hung out with some old friends. I guess what I'm trying to get at here is go out and see. Planning can get you so far. You're not shooting if you're planning. Go out and shoot.
The complete gallery is here. Enjoy!

Sunday, July 8, 2012

4x5 DSLR Sliding back


Sorry for not posting for a while. I thought I'd flip over a new page and start talking about photography again.  A couple months ago I bought a DSLR attachment for my 4x5:
If you're wondering how it works its sort of like a 6x7 or 6x9 graflok attachment but you attach a DSLR to it instead. You simply take your ground glass/plate holder off and attach this to the Graflok then mount your camera to it.
It's great if you miss the camera movements of the 4x5 and use a lot of perspective control this is a nice alternative to Tilt/Shift lenses and certainly a lot cheaper.
I was super excited to use this and proceeded to setup the kit for a test shoot. Its great but has a couple caveats:
  1. It's not great if you have anything wider than a 150mm (50mm in 135/DSLR format). It's mainly to do with the distance between image plane/sensor and the lenses back element. The DSLR mount is raised off the attachment for clearance thus increasing the distance between the lenses back element and the sensor. My 150mm worked fine but the 90mm touched the backside of the attachment. Thankfully there weren't any damages to the lens. Solutions: You could use an extremely recessed lens plate.
  2. Camera movements are restricted. OK, you can't us a 90mm or less. No problem. So I continued working with the 150 and tried to build a 'stitched' panorama using the full horizontal movements of the 4x5. I quickly discovered there are some restrictions - after a certain amount of movement, in either vertical or horizontal movement you'll hit the barreling of the DSLR mount. Not physically but optically. I don't think there are any solutions, not that I can think of anyway.
Besides ranting on about the shortcomings of a product that's way cheaper than a tilt/shift lens made by Canon or Nikon or Schneider (less than 10% of the price) its uses are limited to longer lenses. Anything wider, say a 50 or less would need a specialty lens with small rear element and bag bellows and both those items would cost a fortune. It would probably explain why tilt/shift lenses from any of the mentioned companies cost more than expected as they are designed for photographers that require camera movements. I can say this though, it is fun to use and slowed me down to something resembling the use of my 4x5. The plus side is that I didn't need to use my loupe (if you have live view) nor did I have to make 8+ minute exposures (if you have high ISO capable cameras). I still haven't used it for macro photography but I'm sure it'll perform quite well.
I've attached a couple of sample images from my test. These are stitched panoramas. I will say this - its made photography a lot more interesting especially in a world ruled by digital cameras.

Editorial portraits reshuffled - September 2011


As times passes new photographic gems outshine older ones. I've recently added 2 new portraits (below) to the pack of selects. Enjoy!

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Pictures from the past



I dug up some pictures (click to link) I took a while back that still ring inside whenever I see them. I believe that this work is more a part of the way I work and the way I see than all the work produced over the last six years.

I started shooting within a documentary style much influenced by street photographers like Winogrand, Friedlander and Eggleston. Though this work may not show those particular influences shining through, my own aesthetics and further influence from other artists evolved, mingled and smelted into what I have today. At SFAI I picked up on a lot of stuff that I'll mention over time on this blog as I show more work and speak with confidence about what I see.


I am particularly proud of finding this picture. I've never really forgotten this picture and I'm very lucky to have gotten it.. Part of the beauty of documentary/street photography is being there and 'getting that shot'. The only problem I have with that statement is that its easy enough to say it, but if you don't pay attention, you're not getting shit. This time I was paying enough attention. I remember the dinner and the conversation I remember that it was cold. I've tried many time since this shot to replicate it but to no avail. Its just not the same.

I've had people ask me if I would be able to teach them how to take pictures and I usually tell them something in the order of, 'Sure. Just take pictures.' Now, I don't mean to sounds like a total ass but its literally what I mean. Anyone can tell you how to use a camera, how to use a lens or how to load film but no one can truly teach you how to take pictures that are 'good' (I'll save that for next time). I suggest that you just take pictures. The more you take, the more you'll know what to do the next time. I took a lot of pictures, made a lot of mistakes, make a lot of prints, made a lot of bad decisions before this image got made. Part of everything we do has risks and the risks we decide to take in photography sometimes make images that are winners and sometimes end up being losers.

To me these pictures are part of my top 10 or 20. As Roland Barthes would say, these pictures have 'punctum' to me.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

reaction video funnies

now, according the dates on youtube, the famous '2 girls 1 cup' video came out around a year and a half ago - ample time to forget its grotesque nature and commentary on its realism. I've got to admit I wasn't too fond of the video though the reaction to it was phenomenal. Everyone seemed to have seem it and past it on just so they could get reaction videos of their friends gagging in discomfort. I guess you could call it new art - the reaction to something rather than the physical visual presents of particular object.

So why do I bring this up? I get a laugh out of the reaction videos like I do with those weird Japanese game shows on youtube.

I'll show a couple reaction videos. You may or may not get the same reaction I do.

Now this Joe Rogan one is my favorite:

This next one makes all the more sense - crazy is crazy everywhere.


Tuesday, June 1, 2010

I want one - Celebratory 2010 FIFA World Cup T-Shirt

 

need I say more?

Art Exposure I - ARTHK 10

ARTHK 10 was another fine showing of world class calibre art from something over a 100 galleries from all over the world. The writing of this particular entry comes just days after the closing, just enough time for me to digest the work and formulate some thoughts to share.

Overall, this years showing was better than the previous and probably on par with the first show I attended two years ago. I've probably biased last years show simply because I felt like the photography shown was stronger but the other work, be it drawing, painting, sculpture or video didn't stand up to the level I thought the photography stood. This year, I was particularly please with pretty much everything however the volume of work to absorb was somewhat overwhelming. I described the viewing of the show to someone, after two walkthroughs myself, as like reading 50 magazines in one sitting and trying to articulate three articles from each publication. It was that hairy for me.

Now you might ask why I'm not showing pictures here - well, its out of respect for the artist. I might be little old fashioned in that way, but if you can't remember the piece for itself, a picture is just going to influence what you think it actually looked like and what it actually made you feel. I did however take pictures of the artist names and/or the cover of their books for reference. Why? Cause it makes me do my homework. I believe that if you want to remember a piece that affected you, you should study their work. That's what annoyed me at the show was the fact that people photographed the work like it was theirs. For me that's simply disrespectful. Besides that most galleries don't allow viewers to photograph the work. But I will continue on with my analysis before really ranting.

Again, this was a strong year for the show. Its every getting more interest from bigger and better galleries which benefits viewers and buyers alike. The photography over previous years was probably the strongest. Last years highlight was probably the predictably mammoth Andreas Gursky piece. Last years low was probably vendors displaying like-Gursky scale photographs but with weaker artists. Now I will say this - the HK art community will love seeing Gursky's, Demand's, Hofer's, Struth's, but they probably won't appreciate Winogrand's, Eggleston's or Frank's. A photographer I have yet to see, one I'd really like to see in HK, a Gregory Crewdson.

The rest of the show was really good. Overall I sensed that the Chinese artists were maturing away from the Mao-communist era oppression work and into the new area of Chinese art. The Korean work was strong this new. As always the Europeans and Japanese artist always inspired. As a mentioned before the Gursky shown was brilliant but I would have liked to have seen the race track image from that series. I was happy to see a diCorcia but the picture shown wasn't something to write home about.

A couple of things annoyed me and I will rant about them now. 1) Don't copy: I saw a bunch of copies for more famous work. Some artists can pull it off, others just plain old plagiarize. If you do, its just lazy. Being influenced is one thing, copying is another. I saw Chuck Close's work, probably the second or third time I've had the opportunity, then further down the road I saw some other photorealism that resembled Close's earlier work. I was, as you can imagine, disappointed; 2) Don't touch the art: I don't care if its covered with glass or is security wrapped in lazers and alarms, you never ever touch the art; 3) Please don't photograph the work. I was there with a friend and I told her my peeve and she still photographed it. Do your research, buy their book cause the reprints in the books are a hundred times better than the picture you took on your camera; 4) If you don't know something ask someone: I am usually asked to guide friends through a gallery or a show and share some thoughts on the work. That's fine and I enjoy giving them my opinions. Art is like any other medium, be it books or movies. After you see it you have an opinion. Art is the same way. You might not know a lot about art but others do, like the gallery assistant. They should know everything under the sun about the artist's work. They are your experts. At the show I saw work from Thomas Demand and Gerhard Richter. I knew their work but for Richter's, I saw some work I wasn't familiar with - the abstracts. His retrospective I attended back in SF may have featured some of these but I didn't remember it. I flipped through his book at the show and soon enough I started questioning the gallery personnel about the work. She answered promptly and gave me the information I needed. As for the Demand photograph, the same occurred.

I hope next year the work remains as strong and perhaps reach a higher level.